The Ministry of Truth is in full phalanx-mode over Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s health. What, exactly, is going on with her? We can’t get a straight answer. The only time any news of Ginsburg’s health is mentioned in the Uniparty “media” is when they can spin it into a positive.
Yet clearly she’s not doing well. Back in September, she made an appearance at George Washington University Law School in front of a large crowd, and could barely keep her head up. Not only that, merely speaking seemed taxing and laborious for her. Look at this footage:
She is obviously in failing health. It often took her a while to respond to questions, she loses her train of thought, and her voice is soft and weak. She weighs no more than 70-80 pounds and can barely lift her head.
We are not buying for a second that this woman is in good health.
As we recently heard, she had cancer “nodules” (I put the word in quotes only because I have no idea what a “nodule” is and don’t want to pretend otherwise) removed from her lungs. A week ago, the Supreme Court’s official statement on the matter was as follows:
“Post-surgery evaluation indicates no evidence of remaining disease, and no further treatment is required.”
According to the Ministry of Truth, she’s fit as a fiddle and ready to get back into her Killer Workouts which are so balls-to-the-wall a 27-year-old POLITICO reporter could not even handle them. Doctors estimate that Ginsburg will live to be 117, and plans to run in the Boston Marathon this summer.
Okay, I made some of that stuff up, but sadly not all of it.
Anyone with a functioning brain can see that the woman in the video above is clearly in failing health and has no business being on the Supreme Court in that state. It’s straight-up cruel of Democrats to force her to remain on the bench in her condition solely because of their overriding and all-consuming hatred of Donald Trump. They don’t care a lick about her as a person, they only care about #Resisting Trump. If they had any compassion at all, they’d let her retire and live out her remaining days in peace and privacy with her friends and family.
Returning to the original question of her cancer: maybe it’s just me, but does anyone else have no recollection of hearing about her being diagnosed with cancer several months back? I do not remember hearing anything about it in the Uniparty “media”. Do you?
A Google search shows that Minitrue remarked on Ginsburg’s cancer surgery on December 21 of last year, but only the surgery.
I narrowed the dates on the search to prior to Dec. 21, 2018, but nothing came up–nothing about a diagnosis of cancer:
As far as I can tell the general public had no idea Ruth Bader Ginsburg had cancer prior to December 21, 2018.
I’m talking about this past year. Where was the announcement that she had lung cancer?
It doesn’t appear there was one.
A physician named Brian Joondeph wrote an opinion column yesterday in the Daily Caller asking a few questions about Ginsburg’s recent surgery:
“The statement is curious, however. As a physician myself, I am acutely aware of medical wording and nuance. With medical malpractice attorneys hiding behind every corner, physicians are careful how they create medical statements, especially when there is little absolute certainty in the medical world.
“No evidence of remaining disease” could simply mean that they removed the two cancerous nodules they found on a lung scan after her recent fall. If these nodules represent cancer that spread from her previous colon or pancreas cancer, the doctors removed what they found in her lungs. This doesn’t speak for cancer that might have spread to her liver, brain or bones.
“No further treatment is required” might imply that she is cancer free. It could also suggest the opposite, that she has metastatic cancer that is no longer treatable, other than hospice care, and that further treatment is futile at this point, hence not required.
The media were giddy with excitement that the liberal lion of the court was ready to get back to her job of thwarting President Trump. TMZ caught a glimpse of her, “emerging for the first time” from her Washington, D.C., apartment. CBS reported that her recovery is “on track” with “no sign of remaining cancer.”
Fox News echoed the others by saying her recovery was “on track”, although they curiously described her recent surgery as, “early-stage lung cancer surgery.” Not so if it was metastatic cancer, meaning stage four and quite advanced.”
The bottom line here is that Minitrue is oddly tight-lipped about Ginsburg’s health as of late. We don’t fully know what’s going on.
And this isn’t just me saying that; it’s a practicing physician saying it. She might have stage-four cancer and we wouldn’t even know.
All this leads to the recent (within the past few days) rumors swirling that Ginsburg now has pneumonia and is in failing health. Of course, there’s nothing about her possibly having pneumonia coming from the Ministry of Truth, but a website called the Santa Monica Observer was the first to report it two days ago:
“As any reader of the Santa Monica Observer knew last September, Ruth Bader Ginsburg has developed lung cancer. The 85 year old Supreme Court Justice had surgery as quietly as possible on December 22, 2018.
Following surgery, she has developed complications including pneumonia. Pneumonia often afflicts elderly post surgery patients in the US, since antibiotics have resulted in Multi Resistant Strains of the lung infection.
The left and the main stream media have tried to put on a brave face as Ginsburg missed three straight days of argument this week, interviewing cancer doctors to say that she would recover. They claimed that she was working in her hospital room, knowing that it was untrue.
No one in the media or in the Democratic party want to face the awful truth that President Donald Trump is about to replace one of the Court’s most liberal justices.”
You might be thinking, “What the hell is the Santa Monica Observer? No credibility.” That’s a valid concern because I, too, had never heard of the Santa Monica Observer until today, but apparently they were the first to report on her initial lung cancer diagnosis back in September, which they were then attacked by Minitrue over, even though it wound up being borne out by events:
“When we broke the news in September, which we obtained from a confidential source in Justice Ginsburg’s inner circle, the left went on attack.
Snopes.com labelled our prediction that Ginsburg would undergo cancer surgery then retire, #FakeNews. Sadly it wasn’t.”
Here’s what Santa Monica Observer said in September:
“U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has had a re-occurrence of malignant melanoma, she has told her law clerks. Ginsburg was treated in 1999 for colon cancer and had surgery in 2009 for pancreatic cancer.
She has told key Democratic members of the Senate about her medical condition, including ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee Dianne Feinstein. This explains in part the “take no prisoners” attitude of the Democrats during the Kavanaugh nomination, carefully orchestrating weak 37 year old allegations against Kavanaugh by Women he barely remembers knowing in High School and College.”
Is Santa Monica Observer correct? Only time will tell, but the pneumonia rumors are swirling and have more credence now given that Fox News just reported Ginsburg had to back out of a scheduled speaking event in New York that is not until February 6.
If Ginsburg is so healthy and fully recovered, as the Ministry of Truth is reporting/wishing, then why did she back out of this scheduled event that is taking place several weeks in the future?
A site called “Inquisitr” tried to “debunk” the recent pneumonia rumors with an article headlined, “Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is Not Fighting ‘For Her Life’ With Pneumonia, Despite Outlet’s Claim.” But the Inquisitr piece only attacks the credibility of the Santa Monica Observer, pointing out that SMO claimed Ginsburg had melanoma when in reality it was an early form of lung cancer.
However, we don’t know that she doesn’t have melanoma. We have only been told by Official Sources that she had the lung cancer cleaned up.
And even if we grant that SMO was incorrect about the melanoma claim, they were still correct overall about her having some form of cancer, and that was back in September.
In case you were wondering, apparently, lung cancer surgery often leads to pneumonia for older patients. Joondeph:
“The latest concern is that Justice Ginsburg could develop pneumonia, a common complication of lung surgery, particularly in the elderly and infirm. Pneumonia is often called “the old man’s friend” not to be sexist but because, “left untreated, the sufferer often lapses into a state of reduced consciousness, slipping peacefully away in their sleep, giving a dignified end to a period of often considerable suffering.”
The bottom line is, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg has pneumonia, we are not going to hear about it from the media.
Her health is a closely guarded secret, which can only mean that the outlook is not good.